Purity Test
The purity test is a test of the level of immersion in endoreality.
Expanded explanation
A purity test measures immersion rather than principle, which is why passing one requires agreement with an endo-ideal rather than consistency with any stated standard. Marsh places it inside her account of good and evil, since the idea of good and evil usually describes the structure of an endogroup, goodness is assigned to the most obedient reflector, those who can anticipate the whims of the endo-ideal as their own, and the knowledge considered true is the opinion of the endo-ideal or of endoreality. So what a purity test detects is how completely somebody has internalized that opinion, and anticipating the whim before it is expressed is the highest score. The contrast makes the point. In an exosocial interaction balance is judged on an interactional basis, one exchange at a time, and in an endogroup all virtue is assigned to the endo-ideal and all vice to the negative image, so individual interactions lose their importance as the self expands to include a whole group. There is nothing left to assess a person on except position. This is why purity tests intensify rather than resolve. Since the standard is immersion and immersion has no ceiling, anyone can always be found insufficiently immersed, and the test is available as a weapon against anyone at any time. Marsh lists it among the tactics used to sabotage movements, alongside bikeshedding and concern trolling, since a movement testing its members for purity is testing them for endoreality rather than for contribution.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh locates the test inside her account of good and evil, where goodness means anticipating an endo-ideal's whims.
“Goodness is assigned to the most obedient reflector”
Abstracting Divinity
Examples
- Immersion, not principle
- The test measures how completely an endo-ideal's opinion has been internalized rather than adherence to any stated standard.
- No ceiling
- Since immersion can always be greater, anyone can be found insufficiently pure at any time.
- As sabotage
- A movement testing members for purity is testing for endoreality rather than for contribution, which is why it appears among the tactics.
How others use it
Purity test is common in political commentary for demands that allies agree on every point, and social movement research studies the same dynamic as factionalism and as the narcissism of small differences, Freud's phrase for hostility between closely related groups. Work on high demand groups documents escalating loyalty demands as a control mechanism. Moral foundations research treats purity as one axis of moral intuition, which is a different sense of the word. Marsh's contribution is the criterion, since identifying what is being measured as immersion in endoreality accounts for both why the tests escalate without limit and why they are so useful to anyone wanting to break a movement apart.
Sources
Sourced from the good and evil material of Abstracting Divinity, with the sabotage tactics set out in Stigmergy.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.