Secondary Anima
Anima obtained through fear or other stress responses of another, or destruction. It does not result in the experience of joy, improvement of health or the creation of primary anima conduits. It results in highs, crashes and cravings instead of the peace brought by secure primary anima conduits. It eventually helps to create an endoself which is no longer able to access primary anima.
Expanded explanation
The definition names a source, three absences and one consequence. The source is another living thing under stress or being destroyed, which is what makes secondary anima zero sum where primary anima is not. The absences are what it fails to deliver: no joy, no improvement of health and no primary conduits built. The pattern of highs, crashes and cravings against the peace of secure connection is the recognizable signature, and it is the addiction curve. The consequence is the one that closes the trap, since sustained consumption eventually helps create an endoself no longer able to access primary anima at all, which means the substitute destroys the capacity for the thing it substitutes for. Marsh treats secondary anima as qualitatively different rather than as a lesser version, since the sources differ and consumption creates a different type of self and a different use of force. Two observations follow that account for a great deal elsewhere. Addiction to the euphoria obtained from drugs will lead a person to risk their own and others' wellbeing, and addiction to secondary anima extracted from people behaves the same way, which is why she reads a great deal of policy from endoselves at every level as designed solely to extract stress anima from its victims. And the escalation is structural rather than moral, since predation includes outright murder, rape and torture eventually, as the same supply requires progressively more extraction.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh makes the substitute destroy the capacity for the thing it substitutes for, which is what closes the trap.
“It results in highs, crashes and cravings instead of the peace brought by secure primary anima conduits”
Abstracting Divinity
Examples
- Zero sum by construction
- The source is another living thing under stress, so obtaining it requires somebody's loss.
- The addiction curve
- Highs, crashes and cravings rather than peace is the signature, and it is the same shape as substance addiction.
- Why it escalates
- The same supply requires progressively more extraction, which is why predation intensifies rather than stabilizing.
How others use it
Addiction research describes tolerance, escalation and the shift from pleasure to craving that Marsh takes as the signature, and Berridge's separation of wanting from liking shows why the pursuit continues as the reward diminishes. Sadism research and work on instrumental aggression study the taking of pleasure in others' distress. Trauma research documents the physiological stress response Marsh treats as the transfer. What has no counterpart is the unification, since she treats substance addiction and predation on other people as the same appetite for one substance, which is a claim neither literature makes and which is what allows the framework to move between them.
Sources
Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, and developed throughout Abstracting Divinity.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.