Tantalus asceticism
Asceticism which causes a slight lessening of the cravings of an endoself by removing from view objects they are unable to possess.
Expanded explanation
The third of the three forms of asceticism and the only one that manages a symptom rather than addressing a balance. Debt asceticism produces joy through release from debt and guilt by reducing anima bloat. Punitive asceticism extracts anima from a person's own stores through punishment and shaming. Tantalus asceticism removes objects from view, and what it produces is a slight lessening of craving rather than joy or relief. The name is chosen carefully, since Tantalus stood in water that receded when he stooped to drink beneath fruit that withdrew when he reached, and the point of the reference is that the torment is proximity rather than absence. An endoself cannot enjoy objects they do not possess and may covet a neighbour's couch and hate it until they own it, so what is being managed is the state of being near something unattainable. Removing it from view reduces the craving without supplying anything, which is why the relief is slight and why the practice changes nothing. Marsh's caution about who is praised for asceticism bites hardest here. It is no great accomplishment in one who experiences primary anima with revulsion, and the asceticism of endoselves is not aimed at debt reduction through service or hardship, nor at reanimation through the release of auto-anima, since they reject anything that would cause them to feel gratitude or acknowledge another's kindness. Tantalus asceticism and dissociation from potential debt are what motivate them instead.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh names it for a torment of proximity, since what is managed is nearness to something unattainable rather than lack.
“Tantalus asceticism causes a slight lessening of the cravings of an endoself”
Abstracting Divinity
Examples
- Proximity, not absence
- The myth is about what withdraws when reached for, which is the state removing objects from view is meant to manage.
- Relief without supply
- Craving is reduced and nothing is provided, which is why the effect is slight and the situation unchanged.
- Not an accomplishment
- Renouncing what cannot be enjoyed anyway costs nothing, which is Marsh's caution about praising the practice.
How others use it
Stimulus control is a standard behavioural technique in addiction treatment and in weight management, where removing cues from the environment reduces craving, and the evidence for it is reasonably good. Delay discounting research studies how proximity affects the pull of a reward. The Tantalus myth is a common reference for unattainable desire. Marsh's placement is what distinguishes her use, since classing a technique that clinical practice regards as sensible alongside two other forms of asceticism, and identifying it as the endoself's preferred form, makes it a symptom of the condition rather than a treatment for it.
Sources
Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, with the three forms of asceticism set out in Abstracting Divinity.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.