Skip to content
Binding Chaos
Collaboration

Concentric circle

Updated August 5, 2026

Peer promoted voices or ideas in a transparent, permeable structure where those at the centre receive the most amplification and ideas are audited and taught to the outer circles by knowledge bridges.

Expanded explanation

The image is sound, not rank. Concentric circles relate to amplification, so the voices and ideas nearest the centre are heard most loudly, which is a difference of volume rather than of authority. Nobody at the centre has direct control over the actions of anyone, which is what removes the structure from the category of hierarchy despite its shape. Promotion comes from peers rather than from a certifying body. An expert in a concentric circle is someone whose working peers have pushed them towards the centre on reputation, and any user of the system can review that work directly or through the peer review surrounding it instead of placing faith in a third party credential. Two properties keep the structure honest. Transparency means both the work and the promotion are visible to anyone who wants to check them. Permeability means the circles are not sealed, so people and ideas move in and out as reputation changes. Knowledge bridges do the outward work, auditing what the centre produces and explaining it to the outer circles and the general public, which is how expertise reaches people without converting itself into authority over them. Marsh offers the arrangement as the replacement for representative structures, since it brings expertise and amplification together while giving neither any power of command.

In Heather Marsh’s words

Marsh uses the geometry for amplification rather than rank, which is what distinguishes the structure from a hierarchy.

“They are not hierarchical as they have no direct control over the actions of anyone”

Binding Chaos

Examples

Peer promotion instead of certification
Reputation among working peers moves a voice towards the centre, and any user can audit that judgement rather than trusting an external authority.
Knowledge bridges outward
Ideas at the centre are audited and taught to the outer circles, which is how expertise travels without becoming command.
Volume, not command
Being amplified more loudly gives no control over what anyone else does, which is the difference between a centre and a top.

How others use it

Concentric circles appear in urban sociology as Ernest Burgess's model of the city in rings, and in social network research as layers of intimacy around a person. In ordinary speech the inner circle means the opposite of what Marsh intends, a closed group with privileged access, and the phrase carries an assumption that proximity to the centre is proximity to power. Her structure keeps the geometry and removes that assumption twice over, first by making the circles transparent and permeable rather than closed, and second by defining centrality as amplification rather than as control. The nearest working parallels are open peer review and reputation systems in free software, where standing comes from visible contribution rather than from credential.

Sources

Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, and set out in the governance chapters of Binding Chaos.

Recommended reading path

Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity; Binding Chaos.

A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.