Creation-self
A circle of expansion which includes those relationships related to creation. This is often trapped into a career endogroup.
Expanded explanation
One of the six circles of expansion, and the relationships it contains are relationships to a person's own creations and ideas. Marsh treats those as real relationships rather than as a way of speaking. People can be bonded to the act of creation or to the development of ideas to the point where they do not need personal relationships with others, and she makes the practical point directly: a person can avoid becoming endosocial by pouring energy and attention into a creative project instead of into a person. That is why creation earns a circle of its own rather than sitting inside the discovery or nation circles. The trap named in the definition is employment. Where the nation-self is captured by a state endogroup and the discovery-self by an academic one, the creation-self is captured by a career, with the chief executive occupying the endo-ideal position at that level. Capture does not stop the creating. It redirects it, since all exosocial expansion inside an endogroup is diverted into a force towards transcendence. There is a corollary about loyalty that accounts for a good deal of what gets done to creators. Someone deeply bonded to their own creation or ideas can ignore outside opinion even under extreme coercion or threat of personal harm, which is partly why unusual opinions have so often been treated as an existential threat by an endogroup.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh counts relationships to one's own creations as genuine relationships, capable of doing the work personal ones do.
“pouring energy and attention into connections to a creative project instead of a person”
The Creation of Me, Them and Us
Examples
- A relationship to the work
- Bonding to an act of creation or a body of ideas can sustain a person who forms few personal attachments, which is why this counts as a circle.
- The career endogroup
- Employment is the structure that most often captures this circle, with the chief executive as its endo-ideal.
- Why creators are threatening
- Someone bonded to their own work can disregard group opinion under pressure, which makes unusual ideas an existential problem for an endogroup.
How others use it
Psychology treats creativity as a trait, a process or an output, measured by divergent thinking tasks and studied for the conditions that support it, and organizational research asks how firms capture it. Erik Erikson's generativity comes nearest to a developmental account, but it concerns care for the next generation rather than bonding to a work. What has no standard counterpart elsewhere is the idea that a relationship to one's own creation can substitute for relationships to people without pathology, which most psychological frameworks would read as avoidance or sublimation. Marsh treats it as one legitimate route of expansion among six, and treats the career as the thing that endangers it.
Sources
Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, with the circles of expansion set out in The Creation of Me, Them and Us.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity; The Creation of Me, Them and Us.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.