Second age of nations
Hierarchical trade empires which included a powerful extranational merchant class.
Expanded explanation
Three features and each marks a departure from the first age. Hierarchy replaces autonomy, so societies answer upward rather than governing themselves. Trade becomes the organizing principle rather than something that happens occasionally between complete societies. And a merchant class arises that is extranational, meaning outside the national structures it moves between and therefore not answerable to any of them. The third is the one Marsh treats as decisive, since a class not bound to any of the societies it operates among can arbitrage them and avoid the obligations each imposes on its own people, and being outside is what makes it powerful rather than marginal. A trade empire in her glossary is one including such a class and wealthy in large part because of trade, which makes the merchant class definitional rather than incidental. The religious shift accompanies the economic one. Animism, gynotheism and shamanism are the root first age beliefs that gave way to ancestor worship and androtheism during the second age, so the arrangement that reorganized production also reorganized what was worshipped. The third age extends the same line into a supranational empire where trade has fully abstracted the relationship between oligarchs and the people they exploit, which is the second age with the remaining distance removed.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh treats the extranational merchant class as definitional, since being outside every structure is what made it powerful.
“Hierarchical trade empires which included a powerful extranational merchant class”
Abstracting Divinity
Examples
- Trade as organizing principle
- Exchange stops happening between complete societies and starts constituting the arrangement between them.
- Outside and therefore powerful
- A class answerable to none of the societies it moves among can exploit the differences and avoid the obligations.
- The religious shift
- Ancestor worship and androtheism displaced the first age beliefs in the same period, which Marsh treats as one change.
How others use it
World-systems theory after Wallerstein describes long-distance trade producing core and periphery relations, and the historiography of merchant diasporas, from Philip Curtin's cross-cultural trade to work on Armenian, Jewish and Hanseatic networks, documents exactly the extranational class Marsh names. Karl Polanyi argued that markets were embedded in societies before being disembedded. Archaeology of early states connects trade, hierarchy and record-keeping. Marsh's periodization is broader and less dated than any of these, treating the whole span from the first hierarchical empires to the modern era as one age, which sacrifices historical precision for a claim about structure.
Sources
Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, alongside the entries for the other ages of nations.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.