Skip to content
Binding Chaos
Will

Automolestation

Updated August 5, 2026

Molestation through passive viewing of sexualised material. Particularly for children, this can result in trauma similar to that experienced by other victims of sexualised sublation and sexualised violation.

Expanded explanation

Automolestation names harm inflicted through the passive viewing of sexualised material, without direct physical contact. In Marsh's framework the injury is real without a physical act, because her model already treats coercive experience, not only physical touch, as capable of damaging a person's will and membrane. Sublation is the bending of one will beneath another, and violation is the forced breach of a personal membrane to extract from it. Marsh's account holds that sexualised forms of both inflict trauma through the experience itself. Automolestation extends this to injury done through what a person is made to see: exposure to sexualised material can produce trauma comparable to that suffered by victims of sexualised sublation and sexualised violation, and she identifies the harm as particularly severe for children, whose membranes and wills are still forming. The term's work is to insist that being made to view sexualised material is itself a violation with real and lasting damage, not a lesser or victimless category.

Sources

Defined in the registry canon and attributed by it to Grains of Sand. That book is not among the source texts currently in hand, so this entry carries the canon definition and situates it within Marsh's sublation and violation framework, without a verified book quote or page reference. The Grains of Sand text is pending for full sourcing.

Recommended reading path

Then read in full: Grains of Sand.

A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.