Autonomy
1. Freedom from involuntary, unbalanced interactions aided by possession of a healthy personal membrane and a network of primary anima sources and conduits. 2. Governance by user group including governance of self for those things which impact only self.
Expanded explanation
Autonomy in Marsh's framework is not isolation or pure self-sufficiency but a specific kind of freedom and a specific kind of governance. In the first sense it is freedom from involuntary, unbalanced interactions, the exchanges where energy is taken without consent or return, and it depends on two things: a healthy personal membrane, the intact boundary that protects individuated life, and a network of primary anima sources and conduits, plural channels through which life energy reaches a person. The plurality matters, because someone dependent on a single source or channel is easy to coerce, while a person with many is free to refuse a bad exchange. In the second sense autonomy is governance by user group, decisions made by those affected, including self-governance over matters that affect only oneself. The two senses fit together: personal autonomy is having the membrane and the network to refuse coercion, and political autonomy is deciding, with others, the things that concern you.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh defines the first sense through the membrane and the network of channels.
“Freedom from involuntary, unbalanced interactions aided by possession of a healthy personal membrane and a network of primary anima sources and conduits”
Abstracting Divinity
Examples
- Many channels, real freedom
- A person with several independent sources of energy and support can refuse an exploitative exchange, which someone dependent on one cannot.
- Governance by the affected
- Decisions made by the user group, including self-rule over what touches only oneself, is autonomy in its political sense.
How others use it
Autonomy is central to ethics and political philosophy, from Kant's self-legislation to liberal ideas of individual self-determination and the right to non-interference. Marsh keeps the core of self-determination but grounds it in her energy model, tying personal autonomy to a healthy membrane and multiple anima conduits, and pairs it with a participatory sense, governance by user group, that ties freedom to shared decision-making rather than to isolation.
Sources
Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, and developed through the membrane, anima and governance material of Abstracting Divinity.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.