Idealist (reflector)
What Duchin calls an idealist is a reflector who is currently attached to the radical idea or leader.
Expanded explanation
The term comes from the Duchin formula, a strategy outlined in a 1991 speech by Ronald Duchin teaching corporations how to dismantle activist organizations, which divides activists into four types: radicals, idealists, realists and opportunists. Marsh adopts the taxonomy and re-reads it in her own terms. The idealist and the realist are not two categories in her framework but one, the reflector, and what distinguishes them is only which endo-ideal they are currently reflecting. An idealist reflects the radical idea or its leader. A realist reflects corporate or government power. Neither holds the position by conviction, which is why the conversion Duchin recommends is possible at all. The formula's instruction is explicit. Isolate the radicals, cultivate the idealists and educate them into becoming realists, then co-opt the realists into agreeing with industry, at which point the credibility of the radicals is lost and the opportunists can be counted on to share in the final policy solution. Educating an idealist means poisoning their perception of the radical position, which works because a reflector's attachment is to a figure or a framing rather than to the substance. Marsh's practical point for organizers follows directly. The people most enthusiastic about a movement are not necessarily its most reliable members, and the ones who can be turned by a change in how the movement is characterized were reflecting rather than participating.
In Heather Marsh’s words
Marsh takes an opponent's taxonomy and collapses two of its categories, since both describe one role facing different directions.
“poisoning their perception of the radical position”
Stigmergy
Examples
- One role, two directions
- Idealist and realist differ only in which endo-ideal is being reflected, which is why one converts into the other.
- Why the conversion works
- A reflector is attached to a figure or a framing rather than to the substance, so changing the framing changes the attachment.
- Enthusiasm is not reliability
- Supporters who can be turned by a change in characterization were reflecting rather than participating.
How others use it
The Duchin formula is documented in activist and research literature on corporate counter-campaigning, and it surfaced widely after the Stratfor emails were released in 2012. Related material includes the Powell memorandum and a long history of corporate public relations strategy against environmental and labour campaigns, studied by researchers of astroturfing and SLAPP litigation. Social movement scholarship has its own vocabulary for the same dynamics in co-optation and channelling theory. What Marsh does that the source material does not is translate the categories into a structural account, so that idealist and realist stop being personality types an organizer must sort people into and become one position that a person occupies until something moves them.
Sources
Sourced from the sabotage material of Stigmergy: How to Create a Mass Movement, with the reflector role defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary.
Recommended reading path
Then read in full: Stigmergy: How to Create a Mass Movement.
A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.