Skip to content
Binding Chaos
Power

Libertarian

Updated August 5, 2026

Desirous of liberty, as the freedom to do anything one desires, without social responsibility or acknowledgment of debt. This is a very popular ideology among endoselves.

Expanded explanation

The definition turns on what is being sought rather than on what is opposed. Freedom to do anything one desires is one thing, and doing it without social responsibility or acknowledgment of debt is another, and the second is what Marsh objects to. Debt in her framework is what an unbalanced interaction leaves behind, so refusing to acknowledge it is refusing an accounting rather than refusing an obligation somebody has invented. Her note that the position is popular among endoselves is not an insult but a structural prediction, since an endoself obtains anima by taking and a doctrine holding that nothing is owed for what has been taken is exactly what such a position requires. The historical argument runs through Locke. She points to the irony of a slave owner writing the founding principle, and holds that the flawed principle went on to construct a system of libertarianism denying natural dependencies and relegating them to the fringes of society. Independence is impossible in reality and can only be simulated by using currency to abstract dependency and endosocialism to deny the labour of the negative image, so a libertarian is not describing an achievable state. Marsh is careful to distinguish her own position, since she does not reject all use of power as anarchy or libertarianism must. A caregiver may still stop a baby running in front of a car, and this use of power facilitates the future expansion of a self that is not yet autonomous.

In Heather Marsh’s words

Marsh separates the desire for liberty from the refusal of debt, and objects only to the second.

“a system of libertarianism that denied natural dependencies”

Binding Chaos

Examples

Refusing the accounting
Debt is what an unbalanced interaction leaves, so declining to acknowledge it declines a measurement rather than an invented obligation.
Why endoselves favour it
A position obtaining anima by taking needs a doctrine holding that nothing is owed for what is taken.
Not all power refused
A caregiver stopping a baby from running into traffic uses power to enable a future self, which Marsh does not reject.

How others use it

Libertarianism is a broad family, from Nozick's rights-based minimal state through classical liberalism to left-libertarian traditions that share the anti-authoritarianism while rejecting the property claims, and in Europe the word has long meant libertarian socialism. Critics from the communitarian and care ethics traditions make the argument Marsh makes, that the self-owning independent individual is a fiction concealing dependencies, with Eva Kittay and Alasdair MacIntyre both developing it. Her definition would be rejected by most libertarians as a description of their position, since it builds the refusal of responsibility into the term rather than treating it as a consequence some libertarians dispute.

Sources

Defined in the Binding Chaos series glossary, with the dependency material set out in Binding Chaos and Abstracting Divinity.

Recommended reading path

Then read in full: Abstracting Divinity; Binding Chaos.

A suggested order for exploring this corner of the theory.